Paulo Renato FERREIRA

Hugh V. SIMON, Jr.

Tim ROGMANS

Michael BAUN

Fran EQUIZA

John VAN OUDENAREN

Dirk KONING

Michael BURNS

Brian MURPHY

Harald GREIB

Stormy MILDNER

Franck BIANCHERI

Emanuel PAPARELLA

George VON DER MUHLL

Charlotte YOUNG

Adrian TAYLOR

Tim ERICKSON

Andrew HAYES

Nonie VALENTINE

Colette MAZZUCELLI

Imre HRONSZKY
[Search]


Citizens' perspectives on the future of Transatlantic Relations
- Discover here the opinions of speakers and partners of the Miami Congress -




Michael BURNS Head of Projects and Strategy CEDA See the biography



1. What is your current assessment of the state of transatlantic relations?


From a policy point of view in economic and social terms the UK is attempting to introduce a series of measures developed in the US, which do not relate particularly well to the main social economic and cultural values of the UK and Europe. Given the ongoing economic and social restructuring of Europe there is much, which can be borrowed from the US, however much of this cannot be transplanted without modification. There should be greater consideration given to the significance of European social values and economic structures when working with the US. The US approach is one way of doing things, not the only way.


2. Do you think that the next decade will bring positive news in the two ‘historical’ pillars of the US-EU relations: security and trade?

This relates to the vested interests of the first world and it is inevitable that these advantages can only be preserved by mutual co-operation in security and trade. Any serious split in this relationship would seriously undermine the hegemony of this first world’s advantage.


3. You support the organization of the congress 'Reshaping Transatlantic Relations for the XXIst century: the citizens' perspective' to be held in Miami on November 14th-16th. Do you think that such an event can bring new fresh ideas on the present debate over the transatlantic relations?

Absolutely, in our experience US relations with Europe have been fairly patchy with Europe looking more to the US than vice versa. The US operates at a world level of which Europe is only a part - Europe, rightly or wrongly, places too much emphasis on the symbolism of the US and should adopt a broader view. By exploring these issues in further detail we may arrive at a more balanced perspective as to the relative values of both sides


4. Is the ‘people-to-people’ cooperation able to open new fields of constructive US-EU cooperation in the coming years? In which way?

The interest of US based Foundations and their activities in the economic regeneration of eastern Europe is coming of age with the eastward shift of structural funds. Greater advantage could be taken of the shared objectives
of each side. This appears as underdeveloped at the moment and may be an area worthy of further exploration and development.


5. Being the two richest and most democratic areas on the planet, do you think that both the EU and the US societies face a special responsibility regarding globalization on the one hand; and on the other hand, do you think that they will face a growing number of similar challenges in their way towards the next decades?

As with 2. The US and the EU will fight to maintain their economic advantages over the poorer areas of the world despite the political and social instability this fosters. There is a responsibility for the 'ideal' that the question refers to but the reality will be much different.


6. Beyond treaties, organizations, common interests, ... the cooperation between Europeans and Americans is, in the end, a matter of people cooperating with people (politicians, civil servants, businessmen, executives, professors, activists,). How do you assess this 'human factor' today? Should it be improved?

Modern tools of communication have enhanced this significantly. E-mail is a terrific leveler and an excellent means of communication, which can act as the development point for human contact. This has led to a significant
improvement in our mutual communications. Prior to this such communication was frustrating, fractured and time consuming. However, there is no substitute for the personal meeting. We are, after all, social beings.