Citizens' perspectives on the future of Transatlantic
Relations
- Discover here the opinions of speakers and partners
of the Miami Congress -
|
Harald GREIB |
Vice president Europe 2020 |
 |
1.
What is your current assessment of the 'state' of transatlantic
relations?
The two continents have grown more apart. US is considering
Europe quarreling, unreliable and even condescending.
Europe is considering US arrogant, unilateral, and aggressive.
There does not seem to be much dialogue going on.
2. Do you think that
the next decade will bring positive news in the two 'historical'
pillars of the US-EU relations: security and trade?
And will have to become worse before it becomes better.
But essentially, the ball is in the European side. First,
Europeans have to get their act together and reform the
EU in order to become a reliable partner for the US and
the world, before things will improve.
3.You support the organization
of the congress 'Reshaping Transatlantic Relations for
the XXIst century: the citizens' perspective' to be held
in Miami on November 14th-16th. Do you think that such
an event can bring new fresh ideas on the present debate
over the transatlantic relations?
Is has to. Otherwise, where should new ideas come from?
Certainly not from the political establishment.
4. Is the 'people-to-people'
cooperation able to open new fields of constructive US-EU
cooperation in the coming years? In which way?
States are organized multitudes of people. People are
at the core of any evolution. A multitude of contacts
between individuals will influence the relationship between
states. States are not friends; they just have common
interests. But friendship is more durable than common
interests.
5. Being the two richest
and most democratic areas on the planet, do you think
that both the EU and the US societies face a special responsibility
regarding globalization on the one hand; and on the other
hand, do you think that they will face a growing number
of similar challenges in their way towards the next decades?
This question implies that US and Europe know best. Looking
at history, especially for Europe, I am not convinced.
Maybe we should limit our ambition to trying to do our
best at home and "shine" for other states like
"the city on the hill". Democracy and the promotion
of so - called universal values were often misused in
order to essentially open national markets for western
goods. In consequence, they have lost some of their attractiveness
for other regions in the world when hailed by Americans
or Europeans.
6. Beyond treaties,
organizations, common interests, ... the cooperation between
Europeans and Americans is, in the end, a matter of people
cooperating with people (politicians, civil servants,
businessmen, executives, professors, activists,). How
do you assess this 'human factor' today? Should it be
improved?
This question is my answer to question 4. The human factor
is essential, it has to be improved, we need a maximum
of exchange, especially of young people, still eager to
learn, to discover.
|