Transatlantic VISIONS
 
Archives:   

The People Woke Up
by Dan Daniel Tomozeiu: Political Sciences student
13/06/2003

The war in Iraq is one of the modern events that have been analyzed and interpreted most. Many analysts, politicians, economists and lawyers were trying to understand its causes and to predict how long it is going to take and what kind of impact it will have on the rest of the world. Even today, some good months since the end of the hostilities predictions are still being made, about the way in which the war has influenced this or that policy or a certain region.

Talking about the EU in the context of the war in Iraq feels a bit strange. First of all, the EU as an entity did not participate in the war itself. There wasn't even a clear position put forward by Brussels. There were different official or more personal positions coming from the Parliament, form the Commission and the individual members of the Council (a.k.a. Prime Ministers), positions that were as different as possible. So the EU as a whole was not an active player in the conflict. Some of the EU member states such as the UK or Spain took part in the hostilities, others like France and Germany, in theory, opposed the war, but the EU as a whole did not take part in the war on Iraq.

Secondly the debate that appeared in the EU as such, regarding the impact of the war on the union is at least at the first glance extremely strange. We did not see in the US any discussion on the level of cooperation between US states and whether it changed or not after the war. In the US there were people opposed to the war, including state governors, but none of them actually went as far as to question the collaboration of that specific state with the rest of the US. This comes to prove that the EU as an entity is not yet mature enough to get over its national policy and to create an all encompassing union view. The fact that we are still afraid that a limited, but unfortunately pretty frequent, event such as a war can actually endanger the EU structure comes to show how weak the union is, and what a long way we still have to go from now on.

The strength of the union is another favorite topic among analysts later. Starting from the show put on by experienced and, let's say it franc, sneaky politicians such as Chirac, Blair or Berlusconi, entire armadas of analyst try to understand what is going on the EU. These analysts start by over interpreting every look, every gesture, and every shake-hand hoping to be able to derive from here the level of relations between the member states. That's why we hear nowadays messages such as "Chirac and Blair shook-hands, it means that the relations between the UK and France are getting better, it means that the war didn't have such devastating effects after all, etc."

But what these analysts are forgetting is that Chirac and Blair are mortal, they are in office for a certain period and afterwards they are history. The positions taken by the politicians are positions for the moment, to suit a certain cause. Does anybody really remember what an EU-skeptic John Major was? No, not really, it has been long forgotten and it can be found only in the history books nowadays. Or, did anybody really believe that Schroeder was so much opposed to the war? No, of course not, it was mainly a campaign move. The point is that politicians tend to do things that suit their short term goals. While what really defines the power of the EU is not the politicians or the Brussels machinery, it is the people, the simple citizens that want this Union to succeed, and won't let it go off the tracks because or some sporadic even or some politician with a flamboyant ego.

And it is the people again that will make sure that the EU is moving into the desired direction. The greatest gain of the EU after the war in Iraq is, by far, the shout of the people who started asking for a common foreign policy. Till not long ago the idea of a Common Foreign and Security Policy was nothing more than a pompous name given to the image of a non existent structure. Now, after the war, it is clear that in the future we'll talk about a common policy, a legitimate common policy, a policy born out of desire of the people of speaking with only one voice, of being represented by one person.

Maybe the level of liking and trusting the other states decreased. The latest polls show the dislike of the British for the French and Germans has hit record levels. However there is one thing that unites the majority of the EU citizens. That is their legitimate desire to have a real common policy when it comes to representing the EU on the international stage. It is unbelievable to see how people that ten years ago would have never said anything good about the EU are now actually asking for the EU to speak with one voice, to have one representation to the outside.

The reasons for their desire might be different. Some of them might want to see the EU as a counterbalance to the US, Russia and all the other super-powers. Others might have a more integrationist approach towards international relations, seeing the EU cooperate and decide on policies together with the big players. Others yet might just want the supremacy of the big EU countries over the small ones. However, due to all these reasons, and many others the citizens of the EU have realized that having one coherent external policy for the whole union is crucial right now.

We can try for hours to analyze the behavior of the politicians and from there to derive the level of cooperation between their states. We can try to make predictions on how these states will act and cooperate in the future. They will all remain at the level of predictions. Still, one thing changed for sure in the EU. And that is the desire of the EU citizens to have a common foreign policy. Maybe the war in Iraq brought a lot of problems for the Europeans. Maybe it deepened some divisions between the different nations, divisions that were there, and is better that they are dealt with rather than ignored.

But Iraq also opened the eyes of the Europeans over how much they need a common foreign policy. It made them realize that this common feature was not put in practice by Brussels. Let's just hope that the new European Foreign Minister will be installed soon and that he or she will live up to the expectations.

copyright TIES  

home Legal information  
  TIES wishes to thank its partners.  
  TIESWeb. Copyright©2003. All rights reserved.  
 
16 Rue Fontaine
75009 Paris, France
Email : contact@tiesweb.org